When we talk about data transfer rate, I am surprise that some IT professionals get confused with the differences between bps and Bps.
bps (bits per second) is usually used for raw data transfer speed between two identical devices. It is commonly used for USB, FireWire, Wi-Fi and networking devices.
Bps (Bytes per second) usually refers to the data transfer rate of files. It is commonly used to describe the data transfer rate of PCI bus, ATA, SATA and SCSI devices.
As you can see, different type of devices uses different type of transfer rate. Things starts to get complicated when you decided to purchase an external hard disk with USB, FireWire or eSata connection. This is where confusion started.
1 Byte = 8 bits. Therefore a 512kbps is 64kBps. The formula is as follows:
1k bits = 1024 bits
512k bits = 512 x 1024 = 524,288 bits
Since 1 Byte = 8 bits, 524288 bits can be expressed as
524288/8 Bytes = 65536 Bytes
To convert 65536 Bytes to KBytes
65536/1024 = 64kB
Therefore 512kbps = 64kBps
We can just simply divide 512 by 8 (512/8) = 64kBps
I had compiled a list of various system buses and its transfer speed for comparison purpose:
|USB 2.0 HS||480||60|
|Ultra SCSI 320||2560||320|
* For 802.11n Wi-Fi, the transfer rate ranges from 300Mbps to 540Mbps. Existing working product works at 300Mbps. There is an attempt to push the transfer rate to a maximum of 600Mbps.
So if you bought an external hard disk with USB connection, the transfer rate will be limited to the USB transfer rate.
Please note that USB 3.0 (coming soon) with a transfer rate of 625MBps should solve the limitation of the USB transfer rate and in this case your maximum data transfer rate will be limited to your ATA or SATA hard disk transfer rate.
Please note that the list mentioned above are theoretical rate which is tested under a very specialized environment, in practice we can never achieve 100% of the advertised rate.
For Wi-Fi, please note that although there are a lot of products advertise as compliant to 802.11n specification. The official standard has not yet been finalized.
There is a study taking into consideration of network overhead as shown below:
Typical rate after consider network over head
The abovementioned table is just one of the many studies conducted to test the effective Wi-Fi throughput. For more updated results, please search the Internet.